a)prejudices,
b)misconceptions or misreadings,
c) sense of humor,
d) sense of propriety and the sacred (or not so sacred) -- I could go on all day.
Most writing books and teachers tell you to keep your audience in mind when you write, but this is impossible. The writer can't be empathetic to the reader without pandering to a perceived set view point. As soon as you start writing for a fictitious audience you stop writing for the only audience you really know -- yourself -- and then you lose your voice.
Disagree with me? Great. What to ignore me? Fine. Want to engage and do verbal and logical battle? Even better
I enjoy sarcasm, irony, humor, conflict (in discussions when it is directed and on point), dissent and differing view points. Forums such as this seem to be an appropriate arena for such comments, partly because the nature of the forum and partly because that is the underlying intent. If you wanted the straight and narrow, you wouldn't be here.
Language derives its meaning solely from the social, communal context. You have to understand the vocabulary, syntax, context, social norms and the shared meaning of language. This is the tenuous link which connects us.
The only human language that may be more misunderstood than the written word is the language of sex. My earliest musings on morality settled in on the idea that sex was a communication, a dialogue of two (or more I suppose, this is The American Orgy) people. The immorality came not from anything done with or to the body, but in the deception. Setting aside the biological imperative and society has given sex its own vocabulary, syntax, context, social norms and shared meanings. Fucking someone means something. What it means is based on the shared meaning of the fuckers. If the meaning isn't shared, the communication fails. The morality of the intercourse clouded.
Is this moral? I don't know French -- that is French isn't it? What is the context? What does the social community say about cunt licking? I can tell that the woman in the blue dress has rosy cheeks. Is she enjoying the pleasuring? And just exactly what is being communicated under the dress? To bring this post full circle: The cunt licker cannot always account for the lick-ee's:
a)prejudices,
b)misconceptions or misreadings,
c) sense of humor,
d) sense of propriety and the sacred (or not so sacred) -- I could lick on all day.

0 comments:
Post a Comment