The False Dominance of Gingrich

A mistaken assumption in the sexual realm is that you have to be a Sadist to be dominant and a Masochist to be submissive.  I know it sounds like the oxymoron, "Compassionate Conservatism", but the best kind of sex can come from "Compassionate Dominance."

Gingrich is clearly in the "lick my toes, bitch" sadistic version of politics -- my way and I don't care who gets fucking hurt.  Sure in the BDSM caricature world, people play out this fantasy, but the key word there is "play."   Dominance in politics and in the bedroom amount to fucking with people's quality of life.

I understand the sexual charge of being dominated.  In my uptight religious upbringing I wanted some women to kidnap me, chain me to the bed and fuck me silly, eliminating all the guilt and responsibility.  Sex without guilt and responsibility is a powerful drug.

Next I was hampered by the feminist revolution and the need to be the "sensitive" male.  I was a very good domesticated male.  But biology and inclination ended up trumping religion and feminism -- I love to dominate, but it is a domination fueled by the compassion of having been forced to submit earlier.

I understand the submissive's need to have sex without guilt and the permission to feel pleasure.  I understand the attachment to the dominant force that is bringing about the release.  I understand why the feminist movement saw men as assholes and abusive, because the male dominant force is "dominant"  and easily abused.  Nature red in tooth and claw and all those evolutionary explanations.  Even with all that understanding, I want to dominate, but not harm.

Yet, the harm seems inevitable.  Dominance by its very nature is controlling and life and events control more dominantly than even the most powerful human.   A human is fucked into existence and inevitably fucked out.

We want our leaders -- in the Oval Orifice and the Oval Office -- to be dominant.  We just don't want them to be assholes.